
joker smoker wrote:When I first saw Heston Blumenthal's work I was impressed and even bought his first book. The more I saw of him , however, I began to realise that there was something missing from his food. Everything made perfect sense and was technically correct but his cooking came from the head and not from the heart. It is good to understand the science of cooking but not absolutely necessary. The food I am most interested in comes from the soul and without that special ingredient it is more of a scientific experiment than a social interaction. The ingredient that Blumenthal constantly fails to add to his food is love and without love there is no nourishment.

joker smoker wrote:When I first saw Heston Blumenthal's work I was impressed and even bought his first book. The more I saw of him , however, I began to realise that there was something missing from his food. Everything made perfect sense and was technically correct but his cooking came from the head and not from the heart. It is good to understand the science of cooking but not absolutely necessary. The food I am most interested in comes from the soul and without that special ingredient it is more of a scientific experiment than a social interaction. The ingredient that Blumenthal constantly fails to add to his food is love and without love there is no nourishment.


joker smoker wrote:I have eaten at The Fat Duck and also at El Bulli in Spain yet I have enjoyed the food more at mom and pop diners, French farmhouses and even small guest houses in England. Molecular gastronomy may well teach us how cooking works but I don't believe it shows us how to enjoy eating!

joker smoker wrote:When I first saw Heston Blumenthal's work I was impressed and even bought his first book. The more I saw of him , however, I began to realise that there was something missing from his food. Everything made perfect sense and was technically correct but his cooking came from the head and not from the heart. It is good to understand the science of cooking but not absolutely necessary. The food I am most interested in comes from the soul and without that special ingredient it is more of a scientific experiment than a social interaction. The ingredient that Blumenthal constantly fails to add to his food is love and without love there is no nourishment.

joker smoker wrote:When I first saw Heston Blumenthal's work I was impressed and even bought his first book. The more I saw of him , however, I began to realise that there was something missing from his food. Everything made perfect sense and was technically correct but his cooking came from the head and not from the heart. It is good to understand the science of cooking but not absolutely necessary. The food I am most interested in comes from the soul and without that special ingredient it is more of a scientific experiment than a social interaction. The ingredient that Blumenthal constantly fails to add to his food is love and without love there is no nourishment.


thelawnet wrote:The issue with Heston is it is essentially chemicals for him. He would grow meat in a lab if he could.

joker smoker wrote:I have eaten at The Fat Duck and also at El Bulli in Spain

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 23 guests