Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Please feel free to post reviews of new barbecues, gadgets and of course food. The opinions within the forum are not necessarily that of the web site owner!
Post Reply
User avatar
philnewts
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 248
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 19:39
First Name: Philip Newton
Sense of Humor: I bought a packet of biscuits and on the back they said store in a cool place - so I posted them to Samuel L Jackson's house....
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by philnewts »

Hi

Rather than buy a separate Weber Kettle for direct grilling, I thought I could use the Pro Q without any stackers and without the water pan.

The problem is that it is then very low to cook over and also would I need to place a charcoal grate or use the fire basket?

Any ideas on how best to use this method and raise the cooker up to waist height.

I like the idea of having two zone cooking for quicker grilling and "British" BBQ. Instead of low and slow.


Thanks
Swindon_Ed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 18:48
First Name: Ed Gash
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by Swindon_Ed »

Go to Wickes or someone like that and buy some breeze blocks as they should be fine with the heat and give you a stable platform to raise the bottom of the ProQ with.
User avatar
philnewts
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 248
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 19:39
First Name: Philip Newton
Sense of Humor: I bought a packet of biscuits and on the back they said store in a cool place - so I posted them to Samuel L Jackson's house....
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire UK
Contact:

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by philnewts »

Thanks for your replies. I will give the breeze blocks a try or a metal table. Do you think there will be a way to build a stand?
Chris__M
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 676
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 22:28
First Name: Chris Malme
Location: Market Deeping, Lincolnshire

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by Chris__M »

If you're not careful, you'll find yourself spending (taking both time and money into account) more than a new Weber Compact would cost, which is about 50-60 quid.

The only real problem with the Compact is the shallowness of the dome (hence compact). However, if all you want it for is grilling, I'd suggest it is ideal to complement your ProQ.
User avatar
Steve
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1828
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 12:17
First Name: Steve Heyes
Sense of Humor: Sarcastic, Filthy
Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Contact:

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by Steve »

I'd just hit up eBay for a Weber kettle. Mine cost £20 :D
User avatar
ticktick
Got Wood!
Got Wood!
Posts: 57
Joined: 02 Jun 2010, 20:37
First Name: Jon

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by ticktick »

See if it will fit into an old oil drum (if you take the feet off). Or maybe cut oil drum to accomodate the base of the Pro Q
Chris__M
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 676
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 22:28
First Name: Chris Malme
Location: Market Deeping, Lincolnshire

Re: Using Pro Q as substitute for Weber kettle

Post by Chris__M »

I don't know the Pro Q at all, apart from seeing pictures online.

But is it not possible to use it with all the stackers, but put the charcoal basket higher up, perhaps sitting on the cooking grate of the middle stack, which would put it directly under the cooking grate of the top stack?

Or would this make the thing top heavy, or run the risk of damaging something in the stackers?
Post Reply