Review of Booker Meat

Feel free to ask any questions, one of the experts will certainly respond, don't be afraid to ask anything, we were all beginners at some point.
User avatar
Toby
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 15:28
First Name: Toby Shea
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Review of Booker Meat

Post by Toby »

I have been using booker for ages but had always stayed away from the rolled brisket expecting it to be as bad as the supermarkets but after deciding to smoke one for a chilli I thought what the heck. When I got it home and unrolled it I was surprised to see it had the point and flat intact, in fact a great little brisket, after firing it through hot and fast I was so surprised with the results (I cooked it in 2 hours) that I tried again the next day with two more, one i cooked in 1 hour 45 min the other 3 hours 45mins.......... I also found the pork collars as mentioned in another thread and cooked them up. For those that dont know the collar is pretty much identical to a pork butt and they were absolutely superb! Of course with photobucket the images are backwards but you get the gist.

ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
aris
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 1426
Joined: 06 Jul 2012, 13:18
First Name: Aris
Location: UK

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by aris »

How much did they weigh that they took 2 hours?
User avatar
Toby
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 15:28
First Name: Toby Shea
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by Toby »

not sure off the top of my head, I would guess 3-4kg, but I cooked at 330 in an insulated cooker so I have a bit of an advantage, havent tried the fast method before, I was very surprised at the results.
aris
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 1426
Joined: 06 Jul 2012, 13:18
First Name: Aris
Location: UK

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by aris »

So you didn't use a smoker?
User avatar
Toby
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 15:28
First Name: Toby Shea
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by Toby »

Yes, I used an fec 100
aris
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 1426
Joined: 06 Jul 2012, 13:18
First Name: Aris
Location: UK

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by aris »

What advantages does this give over a regular bullet type smoker?
User avatar
Toby
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1054
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 15:28
First Name: Toby Shea
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by Toby »

Insulated walls therefore you do not have to worry about the outside enviroments ie wind and rain. it also retains heat much better and creates a more consistant enviroment for cooking. Its basically a comerical / competition pellet cooker which can cook 100lbs at a time.
aris
Rubbed and Ready
Rubbed and Ready
Posts: 1426
Joined: 06 Jul 2012, 13:18
First Name: Aris
Location: UK

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by aris »

Hmm, so I could cook my brisket at 300-330 to speed things up somewhat in a regular smoker?

I thought that if you went over a certain temperature the collagen would not melt and the meat would not pull and go tough.
Swindon_Ed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 18:48
First Name: Ed Gash
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by Swindon_Ed »

You can cook a brisket hot & fast but generally when using a bullet smoker they don't come out as good as ones cooked low and slow. i've also found when cooking hot & fast in a bullet you get more shrinkage in your meat meaning you have less of it.
User avatar
keith157
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3816
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 13:35
First Name: Keith
Location: Stevenage, Herts

Re: Review of Booker Meat

Post by keith157 »

Swindon_Ed wrote:You can cook a brisket hot & fast but generally when using a bullet smoker they don't come out as good as ones cooked low and slow. i've also found when cooking hot & fast in a bullet you get more shrinkage in your meat meaning you have less of it.


One of the many cases when "Less is More" does not apply :lol:
Post Reply